Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorConvery, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorKeidser, Gitte
dc.contributor.authorSeeto, Mark
dc.contributor.authorFreeston, Katrina
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Dan
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Dan
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Dan
dc.contributor.authorDillon, Harvey
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-01T02:17:12Z
dc.date.available2014-10-01T02:17:12Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.citationEar Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):e1-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829e058f.0en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-0202
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/57
dc.description.abstractThe primary objective of this study was to determine whether a combination of automatically administered pure-tone audiometry and a tone-in-noise detection task, both delivered via an air conduction (AC) pathway, could reliably and validly predict the presence of a conductive component to the hearing loss. The authors hypothesized that performance on the battery of tests would vary according to hearing loss type. A secondary objective was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a novel automatic audiometry algorithm to assess its suitability for inclusion in the test battery.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins.en_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::MEDICINE::Surgery::Otorhinolaryngology::Audiologyen_US
dc.titleIdentification of Conductive Hearing Loss Using Air Conduction Tests Alone: Reliability and Validity of an Automatic Test Batteryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record