dc.contributor.author | Cameron, Sharon | |
dc.contributor.author | Dillon, Harvey | |
dc.contributor.author | Glyde, Helen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-03T02:33:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-03T02:33:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1234-3425 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/51 | |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between two different working memory task paradigms and academic achievement. Participants were 202 Australian primary-school children who were assessed on the Complex Auditory Span Evaluation (CASE) - a dual-task paradigm - and a reverse digit span paradigm, the number memory reversed test (NMR). Performance was correlated against the participants’ National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) results. Both the CASE and NMR were significant predictors of academic ability in literacy and numeracy. Whereas there was a significant correlation between the CASE and NMR, the relationship was weak (r = 0.18, p = 0.012). It was concluded that, although both types of test are related to academic achievement, NMR and dual-task paradigm tasks may be differentially sensitive to the working memory abilities required in different real-world situations. This result has implications for use of such tasks to predict academic performance. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject | Research Subject Categories::MEDICINE::Surgery::Otorhinolaryngology::Audiology | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of two working memory test paradigms: Correlation with academic performance in school-aged children | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |