Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChing, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Earl E.
dc.contributor.author
dc.contributor.author
dc.contributor.authorSeeto, Mark
dc.contributor.authorSeeto, Mark
dc.contributor.author
dc.contributor.authorMacrae, John
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-25T05:28:05Z
dc.date.available2015-02-25T05:28:05Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationInt J Audiol. 2013 December ; 52(0 2): . doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.847976.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/119
dc.description.abstractObjective—To investigate the predicted threshold shift associated with the use of nonlinear hearing-aids set according to the NAL-NL2 or the DSL m[i/o] prescription for children. For medium and high input levels, we asked: 1) for the same audiograms, how do predicted asymptotic threshold shifts (ATS) differ according to the choice of prescription? 2) How does predicted ATS vary with hearing level for gains prescribed by the two prescriptions?en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjecthearing aid safety; threshold shift; hearing aid prescription; children; NAL-NL2; DSLm[i/o]en_US
dc.titleHearing aid safety: a comparison of estimated threshold shifts for gains recommended by NAL-NL2 and DSLm[i/o] prescriptions for childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record